advanced-prompting-engine

Advanced Prompting Engine

   

A universal prompt creation engine delivered as an MCP server. Measures intent across 12 philosophical dimensions and returns a construction basis from which the client constructs prompts.

The engine does not generate prompts. It provides the dimensional foundation — active constructs, spectrum opposites, tensions, gems, spokes, harmonization pairs, and construction questions — that make prompt construction principled rather than heuristic.

Quick Start

# Install
pip install advanced-prompting-engine

# Or run directly via uvx
uvx advanced-prompting-engine

MCP Configuration

Add to your .mcp.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "advanced-prompting-engine": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["advanced-prompting-engine"]
    }
  }
}

What It Does

The engine positions your intent in a 12-dimensional philosophical manifold:

| Face | Sub-dimensions | Phase | |---|---|---| | Ontology | Particular ↔ Universal, Static ↔ Dynamic | Comprehension | | Epistemology | Empirical ↔ Rational, Certain ↔ Provisional | Comprehension | | Axiology | Absolute ↔ Relative, Quantitative ↔ Qualitative | Comprehension | | Teleology | Immediate ↔ Ultimate, Intentional ↔ Emergent | Comprehension | | Phenomenology | Objective ↔ Subjective, Surface ↔ Deep | Comprehension | | Ethics | Deontological ↔ Consequential, Agent ↔ Act | Evaluation | | Aesthetics | Autonomous ↔ Contextual, Sensory ↔ Conceptual | Evaluation | | Praxeology | Individual ↔ Coordinated, Reactive ↔ Proactive | Application | | Methodology | Analytic ↔ Synthetic, Deductive ↔ Inductive | Application | | Semiotics | Explicit ↔ Implicit, Syntactic ↔ Semantic | Application | | Hermeneutics | Literal ↔ Figurative, Author-intent ↔ Reader-response | Application | | Heuristics | Systematic ↔ Intuitive, Conservative ↔ Exploratory | Application |

Each face is a 12x12 grid of 144 epistemic observation points. Position determines classification (corner/midpoint/edge/center), potency, and spectrum membership. The 12 faces are organized as 6 complementary pairs (cube model) with harmonization through shared surfaces. The engine computes tensions via positional correspondence, gems (inter-face integrations) with cube tier modulation, spokes (per-face behavioral signatures), and a central gem coherence score.

Tools

| Tool | Purpose | |---|---| | create_prompt_basis | Primary — intent or coordinate in, construction basis out | | interpret_basis | Interpretation — plain-language reading of a construction basis | | explore_space | Expert — graph traversal, stress testing, triangulation | | extend_schema | Authoring — add constructs and relations with contradiction detection |

Example: Natural Language Intent

create_prompt_basis(intent="Design an ethical framework for autonomous vehicle decision-making")

The engine locates this intent across all 12 philosophical dimensions and returns:

{
  "coordinate": {
    "epistemology":  {"x": 4, "y": 4, "weight": 0.76},
    "ontology":      {"x": 6, "y": 5, "weight": 0.73},
    "praxeology":    {"x": 7, "y": 4, "weight": 0.72},
    "heuristics":    {"x": 5, "y": 3, "weight": 0.66},
    "phenomenology": {"x": 7, "y": 4, "weight": 0.61},
    "ethics":        {"x": 6, "y": 4, "weight": 0.53},
    "...": "...all 12 faces with (x,y) position and relevance weight"
  },
  "harmonization": [
    {"pair": ["ontology", "praxeology"], "resonance": 0.15},
    {"pair": ["axiology", "ethics"],     "resonance": 0.05},
    "...6 complementary pairs with resonance scores"
  ],
  "spokes": {
    "ontology":      {"classification": "weakly_integrated", "strength": 0.042},
    "epistemology":  {"classification": "weakly_integrated", "strength": 0.039},
    "...": "...per-face behavioral signatures"
  },
  "central_gem": {"coherence": 0.69, "classification": "highly_coherent"},
  "construction_questions": {
    "ethics": {
      "template": "What moral obligations does this prompt impose or assume?",
      "position_summary": "balanced Deontological/Consequential + moderately Agent-focused",
      "meaning_mechanism": "composition",
      "phase": "evaluation"
    },
    "...": "...12 position-specific philosophical questions to guide prompt construction"
  }
}

The output tells you: this intent is primarily about knowledge validation (epistemology 0.76), what entities exist (ontology 0.73), and action structure (praxeology 0.72). Ethics registers at 0.53 — present but not dominant. The harmonization shows ontology and praxeology resonate strongly (0.15) — the theoretical "what exists" aligns with the practical "how to act."

Example: Pre-formed Coordinate

For precise control, pass a coordinate directly:

coordinate = {
    "ontology": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "weight": 1.0},      # corner: particular + static
    "ethics": {"x": 0, "y": 11, "weight": 0.9},         # corner: deontological + act
    "methodology": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "weight": 0.8},     # corner: analytic + deductive
    # ...all 12 faces with x (0-11), y (0-11), weight (0-1)
}
result = create_prompt_basis(coordinate=coordinate)

Architecture

• Stack: Python + NetworkX (topology) + numpy (computation) + SQLite (persistence) + MCP SDK
• Graph: 1873 nodes, 2279 edges (12 faces × 144 constructs + 132 nexi + 1 central gem)
• Pipeline: 8 stages (Intent Parser → Coordinate Resolver → Position Computer → Construct Resolver → Tension Analyzer → Nexus/Gem Analyzer → Spoke Analyzer → Construction Bridge)
• Geometry: Vector Equilibrium (cuboctahedron) as latent inter-face topology, cube model for 6 complementary pairs
• Deployment: Single process, stdio transport, no daemon, no external dependencies

Documentation

• docs/DESIGN.md — Full design specification
• docs/CONSTRUCT-v2.md — The Construct specification (what faces, points, spectrums, nexi, gems, spokes ARE)
• docs/CONSTRUCT-v2-questions.md — 144 construction question templates by zone
• docs/adr/ — 13 Architecture Decision Records

Development

pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest tests/ -v

Rebuilding the semantic bridge (optional)

The shipped package includes pre-computed BGE-derived artifacts (semantic_bridge.npz, semantic_vocab.json). To rebuild them from scratch (e.g., after pole-synonym edits), install the build extras:

pip install -e ".[build]"
python -m nltk.downloader wordnet omw-1.4
python scripts/build_semantic_bridge.py

The build uses BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5 (~1.3 GB, downloaded once to HuggingFace cache) and wordfreq for frequency ordering. Runtime dependencies are unaffected — end users only receive the pre-computed artifacts.

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup and guidelines.

Security

See SECURITY.md for vulnerability reporting instructions.

License

MIT