Featured

Deploy OpenClaw in 60 seconds — 20% off logoDeploy OpenClaw in 60 seconds — 20% off

Launch OpenClaw on Hostinger in about 60 seconds and keep your agent live 24/7. Our referral link gives you 20% off, no coupon code needed.

Launch on Hostinger
Run your Hermes agent on Hostinger, fully managed logoRun your Hermes agent on Hostinger, fully managed

Launch Hermes on Hostinger in one click, fully managed, no VPS knowledge needed. Use code ZACAARON10 for 10% off.

Launch on Hostinger
Crawl and scrape any site into clean data, 10% off logoCrawl and scrape any site into clean data, 10% off

Firecrawl crawls and scrapes any site into clean markdown for your agent. Get 1,000 free credits, and new users get 10% off their first purchase.

Try Firecrawl free
6,000+ web scrapers for your AI agent, start free logo6,000+ web scrapers for your AI agent, start free

Apify gives your agent live web data: 6,000+ prebuilt scrapers and actors, MCP-ready. Sign up free with $5 in usage credits.

Try Apify free
One API to scrape, enrich, and extract the internet. logoOne API to scrape, enrich, and extract the internet.

Context.dev gives your agents a single API to scrape, enrich, and extract live web data — no proxies, no parsers, no maintenance.

Start building free
SetupClaw: done-for-you OpenClaw for founders & exec teams logoSetupClaw: done-for-you OpenClaw for founders & exec teams

White-glove OpenClaw for founders and exec teams (4–50+ employees): we install, harden, integrate your tools, and maintain it — secured from day one.

Get it set up for you
SEO data APIs for your agent, $1 free credit logoSEO data APIs for your agent, $1 free credit

DataForSEO gives your agent live access to SERP results, keyword data, backlinks, and on-page SEO data through one API. New accounts get a $1 credit, good for up to 20,000 keyword or backlink lookups.

Try DataForSEO free
Reach 48,000+ AI builders

A flat monthly placement in front of developers actively installing AI tools. No lock-in, cancel anytime.

Advertise here

Works with

Claude CodeClaude DesktopCursorVS CodeClineCodex CLIOpenClaw+ any MCP client

Install to Claude Code

This server doesn't publish a one-line install command. Follow the setup in the source repository.

Summary

Self-hostable agentic-AI LMS: catalog, RAG tutor, FSRS reviews, AI authoring, ingest.

README.md

<div align="center">

Lumen

Type a one-sentence learning goal — an AI orchestrator builds you a private course in ~50 seconds, a RAG tutor with citations teaches it, and you can audit every agent decision it made.

<sub>Custom multi-agent system, no LangChain · public evals with the weak scores kept in · live in production</sub>

![CI](https://github.com/ahmedEid1/lumen/actions/workflows/ci.yml) ![authoring eval 3.85/5 (n=10)-2ea44f?style=flat-square)](https://lumen.ahmedhobeishy.tech/eval) ![MCP registry](https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=io.github.ahmedEid1%2Flumen) ![License: MIT](LICENSE)

Live demo · Eval results · Architecture · MCP server

<img src="docs/screenshots/gifs/define-build.gif" alt="Real production recording. A one-sentence goal becomes a learning brief, then the authoring orchestrator builds a 4-module, 16-lesson private course." width="900">

<sub>Real production recording (Groq Llama 3.3 70B). Intake trimmed 6×, the ~50 s build 16× — the brief and the finished course are real-time.<br> Try it yourself: the one-click demo pre-fills demo@lumen.test / Demo!2026 and drops you into the tutor (free-tier box — give a cold page a few seconds).</sub>

</div>

What this is

A learner-owned, two-role e-learning platform — every signed-in user runs the whole loop themselves; admin only moderates and configures. The product is the loop; the point of the repo is the agentic system underneath it.

| Step | What happens | |---|---| | Define | A guided AI intake (capped at six turns) turns a fuzzy goal into a structured learning brief — the source goal is field-encrypted at rest | | Build | The authoring orchestrator builds a private course from the brief — honest status, no half-finished partials, re-runnable, cancellable (build.py, the durability/idempotency/quota shell) | | Learn | A course-scoped RAG tutor answers with lesson citations and a visible tool-call trace | | Share | Publishing stays private; public listing is an explicit share + admin moderation state machine with an immutable audit trail | | Clone | Any listed course can be remixed into your own draft, with server-written "Based on …" provenance and a sanitized export (no enrollments, traces, or soft-deleted content) | | BYOK | Bring your own model key (OpenAI / Anthropic / Groq / Mistral) — allowlisted providers, server-owned base URLs, envelope-encrypted write-only keys |

Shipped to production as 2.0.0-two-role (CHANGELOG) — built as a gated waterfall: requirements → design → 6 ADRs → seven build streams, each cleared a Codex challenge, an independent Claude review, and a live in-browser walk before merge.

The agentic layer

Every item below is on production today, with the code one click away.

Custom multi-agent orchestrator — no frameworks

The tutor picks per-turn among five sub-agents in tutor_subagents/retriever, web_searcher, code_runner, quiz_generator, concept_explainer — under a hard cap on tool-call rounds (streaming variant). The authoring side runs a six-stage pipeline — researcher → outliner → critic → reviser → lesson-drafter → final-critic — in authoring_orchestrator.py, capped at six revise/critic calls.

<div align="center"> <img src="docs/screenshots/gifs/tutor.gif" alt="The RAG tutor streaming an answer: question sent, retriever sub-agent fires with its latency visible, answer streams in (2× speed)" width="900">

<sub>Production recording at 2× — the retriever fires (latency on-screen), then the answer streams.</sub> </div>

Course-scoped RAG with citations, behind one authorizer

Retrieval is scoped per course and routed through a single ACL clause (visibility.py, ADR-0029) so private and cloned courses never leak chunks. Embeddings via Cloudflare Workers AI (bge-small-en-v1.5, 384-dim) into pgvector; answers cite specific lesson chunks.

Every agent decision is auditable

Each LLM call logs prompt/completion tokens, USD cost, latency, and outcome to the llm_calls table (llm_call_log.py); each agent step lands in agent_tracer.py. Learners get a per-turn "show me how you got this" drill-down — planner steps, tool calls, retrieval audits with similarity scores; authors get a step-by-step build replay.

<div align="center">

| Tutor-turn trace | Authoring build replay | |---|---| | <img src="docs/screenshots/agent-trace.png" alt="Trace drill-down: step-by-step timeline with planner, tool calls, retriever and synthesiser steps, plus retrieval audit cards showing per-chunk similarity scores" width="440"> | <img src="docs/screenshots/studio-replay.png" alt="AI authoring replay: 8 orchestrator steps with per-step durations and the researcher step's prompt and response expanded" width="440"> |

</div>

Eval harness with LLM-as-judge — published whole

Three golden suites (30-item tutor, 10 authoring, 10 ingest) under evals/, judged 0–5 per axis, plus adversarial probes. A 3-item smoke gates every PR (workflow); results are public at /eval.

The point isn't the scores — it's the harness: LLM-as-judge applied honestly to one strong subsystem and two early ones, every number reproducible with make eval suite=… and smoke-gated in CI.

| Suite | Judged | LLM-judge score | Reading | |---|---:|---:|---| | Authoring | 10 / 10 | 3.85 / 5 | Strong — the headline number, backed by the raw JSONL | | Tutor | 10 / 30 | 2.33 / 5 | Early — citation-format mismatch between the judge's expected citations and what the retriever pulls; 20 items skipped, cause documented | | Ingest | 4 / 10 | 0.83 / 5 | Early — v1 chunker emits one module per video; 6 items failed upstream transcript fetch before judging |

The weak scores are published whole, on purpose. Methodology · raw reports.

MCP server on the official registry

app/mcp/ exposes nine tools (catalog, RAG tutor, FSRS reviews, AI authoring, ingest) over stdio + HTTP with OAuth client-credentials, published as io.github.ahmedEid1/lumen. Write tools gate on the can_author capability; URL ingest stays admin-only + flag-gated (ADR-0025).

Wiring it into an MCP client takes one JSON block:

<details> <summary><b>Use it from Claude Desktop / Claude Code</b></summary>

// claude_desktop_config.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "lumen": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "app.mcp", "--transport", "stdio"],
      "env": {
        "LUMEN_MCP_AUTH_TOKEN": "<client-secret from `make mcp-token`>",
        "DATABASE_URL": "postgresql+asyncpg://lumen:lumen@localhost:5432/lumen"
      }
    }
  }
}

Or for Claude Code: LUMEN_MCP_AUTH_TOKEN=<secret> claude mcp add lumen -- python -m app.mcp --transport stdio, then ask "list my Lumen courses" and watch list_courses, ask_tutor, create_course_draft, … fire. Full operator guide: docs/mcp.md.

</details>

BYOK without the foot-guns

Per-credential 256-bit DEKs wrapped by a versioned server KEK (secrets_crypto.py); decryption only inside the dispatch path — never in logs, traces, exports, or admin views. A prod boot guard refuses to start with stored credentials but no real KEK (ADR-0027). Request-count quotas close the $0-BYOK bypass of the dollar budget guard.

Zero-downtime phased migrations with evidence gates

The two-role rebuild migrated student/instructoruser live: widen accepted roles → backfill → drop old values only after access tokens drained their 15-min TTL. The Alembic chain enforces one phase per run, and migration-level evidence gates refuse to tighten constraints over un-backfilled rows — one of them caught a real prod data condition (85 legacy chunks with NULL embedding model) at deploy time.

Architecture

The short version: one FastAPI service owns all invariants, the agents are plain service-layer code, and every LLM call crosses one provider seam and one cost meter.

flowchart LR
    user([User · authors + learns])
    admin([Admin · moderates + config])

    subgraph App[Application]
      web[Next.js 15 · RSC]
      api[FastAPI · Python 3.13<br/>capability-based authz<br/>central is_publicly_listed authorizer]
      worker[Celery worker + beat]
    end

    subgraph Agents[Agent layer]
      define[Goal intake → brief]
      authoring[Authoring orchestrator<br/>researcher → … → final-critic]
      tutor[Tutor orchestrator<br/>+ 5 sub-agents]
    end

    subgraph Data[Data]
      pg[(Postgres 17 + pgvector)]
      redis[(Redis 7)]
      s3[(MinIO S3)]
    end

    subgraph LLM[Swappable LLM layer]
      provider{LLM_PROVIDER dispatch}
      groq[Groq · Llama 3.3 70B]
      byok[BYOK allowlist<br/>OpenAI · Anthropic · Mistral · Groq]
    end

    subgraph Eval[Eval loop]
      golden[(Golden datasets)]
      judge[LLM-as-judge 0–5]
      meter[llm_calls<br/>tokens · cost · latency]
    end

    user --> web --> api --> pg
    admin --> web
    api --> redis & s3 & worker
    api --> define --> authoring
    api --> tutor --> pg
    mcp[MCP server · 9 tools] --> api
    authoring & tutor --> provider
    provider -.platform.-> groq
    provider -.per-user.-> byok
    api --> meter
    golden --> judge --> provider

Provider-agnostic by env var — the live demo runs Groq's free tier; users dispatch on their own allowlisted keys. Every call crosses the cost meter, so budgets, quotas, and observability behave identically across providers. Full topology: docs/architecture.md.

Stack: Python 3.13 · FastAPI · async SQLAlchemy 2 · Alembic · Celery — Next.js 15 · React 19 · TypeScript 5 · Tailwind 4 · TanStack Query — PostgreSQL 17 (pgvector + tsvector) · Redis 7 · MinIO — Docker Compose · GitHub Actions · Trivy + CodeQL + gitleaks · Caddy 2.

How it's built and tested

The process is the portfolio as much as the code. Every build stream cleared three gates before merge:

  1. Codex challenge — a second-brain CLI attacks the design, plan, and code; findings triaged and resolved.
  2. Independent Claude review — a gating review subagent re-checks against source until clean.
  3. Live evidence — drive the app as a real user in a browser, locally and on prod, on top of unit/E2E/a11y suites. Running-the-app evidence is required, not optional.

At the 2.0.0 release: backend 1,421 tests / frontend 468 tests, all green; WCAG 2.2 AA axe-core gate (11 surfaces, 0 violations); en + ar i18n parity; visual-regression baselines; Playwright E2E on Chromium and WebKit. The UI itself went through a 20-loop redesign (30+ Radix-backed primitives, ⌘K command palette, dark/light themes) with five in-loop Codex rescue passes plus a final Codex review. A green main auto-deploys to production.

<div align="center"> <img src="docs/screenshots/gifs/cmdk.gif" alt="Command palette: Ctrl+K opens it over the dashboard, typing filters live course search results alongside navigation, theme, and account commands" width="700">

<sub><kbd>⌘K</kbd> — navigate, search courses, switch theme, sign out.</sub> </div>

Run it locally

Prereqs: Docker Desktop 4.30+ (or Engine 27 + Compose v2).

git clone https://github.com/ahmedEid1/lumen.git
cd lumen
cp .env.example .env
make up && make migrate && make seed

Open <http://localhost:3000> and sign in:

| Role | Email | Password | |---|---|---| | admin | admin@lumen.test | Admin!2026 | | user | teacher@lumen.test | Teach!2026 | | user | student@lumen.test | Learn!2026 |

Without an LLM key the AI features fall back to a deterministic noop provider — the rest of the app still works. For the real thing (define/build, tutor, evals), a free Groq key is enough:

LLM_PROVIDER=openai
OPENAI_API_BASE=https://api.groq.com/openai/v1
OPENAI_API_KEY=<your-groq-key>
LLM_MODEL=llama-3.3-70b-versatile

The same LLMProvider abstraction takes native Anthropic or OpenAI by env var — no code changes. Feature flags (FEATURE_BYOK_ENABLED, FEATURE_PRIVATE_PUBLISH_ENABLED, CLONE_ENABLED, FEATURE_TUTOR_STREAMING) default off; set them in .env once their prerequisites (e.g. a real BYOK master key) are in place. make demo-seed adds the richer agentic-demo bundle.

<details> <summary><b>More screenshots</b> — dashboard, catalog, the agent-replay home page, the public eval page, a freshly built course, the brief review</summary>

| | | |---|---| | !Learner dashboard with in-progress courses and the "create a course to learn" entry | !Public catalog with subject filters and tag rail | | !The home page: an agent-replay hero that walks through a real tutor turn | !Public eval page: honest scores with a sealed-run badge | | !A freshly built private course in the three-column learn workbench | !Brief review: level, time budget, outcomes — nothing builds until you confirm |

</details>

Status, limits, and honesty

  • Live at lumen.ahmedhobeishy.tech — 2.0.0-two-role, shipped 2026-06-06. Free tier end-to-end: Groq + Cloudflare Workers AI + one AWS t4g.small (runbook: docs/deployment/aws-vps.md). Budget guards and request quotas cap spend; expect free-tier latency under load.
  • Email verification is off in prod (EMAIL_ENABLED=false — no SMTP configured). A flag, not a code limitation.
  • Eval scores include the weak ones, with causes documented — see the table above and docs/eval/ for raw JSONL.
  • Test counts are release-time snapshots (the suites keep moving with main); CI is the live source of truth.

Built by

Ahmed Hobeishy — AI / Agent Engineer in Essen, Germany. Lumen started as a 2020 Django side-project; five years and one model revolution later it's the centrepiece of my agentic-AI work: agents that are measured (golden evals, LLM-as-judge), auditable (per-call cost/latency traces, citation checks), and shipped (live, CI-gated, self-hostable).

Open to AI / Agent Engineer roles in Germany where evaluation and observability are first-class.

LinkedIn · GitHub · or open an issue here.

See related servers & alternatives →

Related MCP servers

Browse all →

Related guides

Hand-picked reading to help you choose and use Vector & Memory servers.